- From: Ian B. Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2001 16:13:44 -0400
- To: Al Gilman <asgilman@iamdigex.net>
- CC: "gregory j. rosmaita" <oedipus@hicom.net>, wai-xtech@w3.org, Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
Al Gilman wrote: > > At 03:14 PM 2001-08-03 , gregory j. rosmaita wrote: > >CMN: I think the "pictures of words" bit should go back to the WCAG group. > > > >GJR: which part? that pictures of words ain't words? > > > ><span lang="franglais"> ceci n'est pas une pipe, non? </span> > > > >no, it's not a pipe -- it's a question... > > > > a) everything that generates debate in XTECH should go back to the affected > groups -- here at least GL and UA -- who may confirm or deny acquiescence in > the proposal of the intergroup caucus. But perhaps after giving XTECH some > time to settle on a provisional resolution of the question. Cf. conference > committee in a bicameral legislature such as in the U.S. Let me add that I'd like to see a concrete proposal before I would want to take any UAWG time reconsidering our definitions. - Ian -- Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs Cell: +1 917 450-8783
Received on Friday, 3 August 2001 16:16:12 UTC