Re: alphabytes (was Re: definition)

Al Gilman wrote:
> Note: What we want is stricter than anything one can define simply as 'text.'
> This is the bug in the circular proposal [text is what is trimodal accessible]
> for a UAAG definition.  That is why I have introduced separate definitions for
> text and accessible text.

I'm not sure I see the circularity of the UAAG defintions of text and
text element. Can you explain?

 _ Ian

Ian Jacobs (
Cell:                    +1 917 450-8783

Received on Friday, 3 August 2001 16:21:13 UTC