- From: Al Gilman <asgilman@iamdigex.net>
- Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2001 16:24:56 -0400
- To: "gregory j. rosmaita" <oedipus@hicom.net>, <wai-xtech@w3.org>, "Charles McCathieNevile" <charles@w3.org>
At 03:14 PM 2001-08-03 , gregory j. rosmaita wrote: >CMN: I think the "pictures of words" bit should go back to the WCAG group. > >GJR: which part? that pictures of words ain't words? > ><span lang="franglais"> ceci n'est pas une pipe, non? </span> > >no, it's not a pipe -- it's a question... > a) everything that generates debate in XTECH should go back to the affected groups -- here at least GL and UA -- who may confirm or deny acquiescence in the proposal of the intergroup caucus. But perhaps after giving XTECH some time to settle on a provisional resolution of the question. Cf. conference committee in a bicameral legislature such as in the U.S. b) The picture forms of the above exchange include, but are not necessarily limited to, a Nassi-Schneiderman chart of the logic integrating multiple senses of 'pipe' with assertions by Gregory and Charles. Or Sean could RDF it and that makes a graph that one then decorates with icons and arranges tastefully on the page... Al >gregory. >------------------------------------------------ >The optimist thinks that this is the best of all >possible worlds; the pessimist knows it is. >------------------------------------------------ > Gregory J. Rosmaita, oedipus@hicom.net > Webmaster & Minister of Propaganda, VICUG NYC > The Visually Impaired Computer Users' Group > of the New York City Metropolitan Area > <http://www.hicom.net/>http://www.hicom.net/~oedipus/vicug/index.html >------------------------------------------------ >
Received on Friday, 3 August 2001 16:09:42 UTC