Re: [wbs] response to 'Scripts for Evaluation Intro Videos (Updated)'

Hi Howard,

Many thanks for your comments. I addressed most of them in the latest 
update. Some issues are on the agenda for discussion. Below are some 
responses to specific comments:


On 13/09/2019 00:33, Howard Kramer via WBS Mailer wrote:
[SNIP]
>> ---------------------------------
>> Video 1: Evaluation Overview
[SNIP]
> I really liked the first 6 segments. Then the video branched out to other
> areas which I think is fine but it didn't seem to flow as well. I wonder if
> some type of two sentence comment prior to segment 2 might explain what is
> going to be covered in this video. Something like "This video will cover
> tools and other resources for evaluating your pages for accessibility. We
> will then cover these resources in more depth in subsequent videos."

Added to agenda for discussion. Initially we wanted to avoid too much 
dependency between the videos. They are not intended to be a series.


> Also, maybe it would help to change segment 13 to "With these resources and
> guides you can learn how to check your website for accessibility barriers[,
> receive input from user testing,] and prioritize the issues you need to
> address first." [Added text in brackets]

Isn't receiving input from testing with users (not user testing!) also 
part of checking for barriers? Not sure this is worth the add here.


>> ---------------------------------
>> Video 2: Preliminary Evaluation
[SNIP]
> This may have already been covered before and decided against but I wanted
> to see a demonstration of how you would apply Easy Checks, even if just for
> one area, such as alt text. This video shows us that the resources exists.
> I think it needs an example of how it would be used to draw in potential
> users.

An example check (for "page title") is in sequence 5.


[SNIP]
>> ---------------------------------
>> Video 3: Selecting and Using Tools
[SNIP]
> Similar to video 2, I thought this was too abstract. I'd like to see some
> examples of tools. I know this is problematic but I think people need to
> see some examples of how these tools work.

Beside the vendor-neutrality issue, there are just so many types of 
tools that I would not know which to pick. How would you address this?


Thanks,
   Shadi

-- 
Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/
Accessibility Strategy and Technology Specialist
Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI)
World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)

Received on Friday, 13 September 2019 04:06:29 UTC