- From: David Pawson <DPawson@rnib.org.uk>
- Date: Wed, 27 Aug 1997 15:09:46 +0100
- To: w3c-wai-wg@w3.org
AL> A combination of some redundancy (such as by transcripts and > captions, which shadow sound in text) in the data bundle offered > by the source, together with user control over how the > source-provided streams or components are presented, gives us the > maximum adaptability for the minimum cost. [David Pawson] I was thinking only on the browser / stylesheet end. My starting point is the information availability at the page of html. I have the source available (a graphic [ maybe an alt], a sound, some text). What is needed is some preparatory work to assign these to 'my' preferred channel, with event association. Then go ahead and 'read'. If we can block the browser from its asynchronous actions (playing the audio, showing the video clip) then I can have a single source sound / site / feel, fed serially to me, the way I want it, rather than the way the author intended it (blazing saddles clip with the sound of farting in the background!). I can't remember which of TVR's 3 modes we are talking about, but it seems a good candidate for audio/tactile/visual stylesheet commonality IMHO. > > > Al> Sometimes alternate presentation of portions of the information > will be prepared at the source, and sometimes they will be > generated at the user. [David Pawson] If we can 'generate' alts [ e.g. here's some sound the author forgot to describe] then even better, the channel source is switching from data sink to source to assist the user need. Regards, DaveP
Received on Wednesday, 27 August 1997 10:08:00 UTC