- From: Daniel Dardailler <danield@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 02 Jul 1997 15:47:40 +0200
- To: Jason White <jasonw@ariel.ucs.unimelb.EDU.AU>
- cc: w3c-wai-wg@w3.org
> The proposal for using anchor elements is undoubtedly superior and I would > support it. However, they may be one potential problem. Admittedly, I have > not found time to read the entire CSS specification, but the initial > sections of that document indicate that only class and id attributes can > be used as selectors, not rel and rev attributes. Since it would be > desirable to be able to apply special speech or braille styles to anchor > elements that designate page numbers as distinct from other occurrences of > anchors, it may be necessary to use the class attribute in addition to, or > in place of, the rev and rel attributes. Another possibility would be to > modify CSS syntax to enable rev and rel attributes to act as selectors. I > apologize in advance if these remarks are mistaken, since I really should > have read all of the CSS documents before commenting. There is a very good remark, Jason, I also made them at the Sophia meeting :-) [BTW, is using smileys in the text something that bothers blind users or is is OK ?] CSS will probably be extended with more selectors but the issue of readyness is important so using CLASS, NAME or ID is better than REL.
Received on Wednesday, 2 July 1997 09:48:05 UTC