- From: Ian B. Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2001 16:08:11 -0400
- To: w3c-wai-ua@w3.org
Hello, The definition of "operating environment" in the 22 June draft states: 'The term "operating environment" refers to the environment that governs the user agent's operation, whether it is an operating system or a programming language environment such as Java.' I think that we should make clear that for Java user agents, the operating environment is Java, even when it's running in the surrounding Windows environment. In this case, I expect the UAAG requirements related to "conventions" to refer to Java conventions as long as the Java environment is used, otherwise Windows conventions. Do others expect this type of cascade? If so, we should set that expectation in the document, for example in section 3.9 [1] under "Use of operating environment features as part of conformance." For example: "Some of the checkpoints in this document involve operating environment conventions (checkpoints 4.2, 4.3, 4.9, 6.3, 6.4, 6.5, 6.6, 7.1, 7.2, 7.3, 7.4, 10.2, 10.3, 10.4, 10.7, 11.3, and 11.4). The operating environment used to satisfy these requirements must be named in a well-formed conformance claim. A user agent may be implemented in an operating environment that is embedded within another (e.g., a Java user agent running within an underlying operating system). The requirements of this document only apply to the "innermost" operating environment governing the relevant user agent behavior, user interface, APIs, etc. For example, if a Java-based user agent relies on the underlying operating system to satisfy checkpoint 4.2, then the conventions to follow for that checkpoint would be those of the operating system. Similarly, in the case where two operating environments are governing the execution of the user agent, then UAAG requirements apply to to both of them." _ Ian [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/WD-UAAG10-20010622/conformance.html#conformance-topics -- Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs Cell: +1 917 450-8783
Received on Thursday, 5 July 2001 16:10:54 UTC