- From: Jon Gunderson <jongund@staff.uiuc.edu>
- Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1998 11:59:02 -0600
- To: Scott Luebking <phoenixl@netcom.com>, w3c-wai-ua@w3.org
There needs to be consensus on issues. Votes are helpful in determining the current consensus (or lack of consensus) of the group, but may not be good for final decisions. I think we need to look at issues from a number of different angles and not continue to rehash the same territory. I think the table linearization issue has been to narrowly defined for just screen readers. Please see other messages I have send today, I have tried to offer a broader picture of the issue. At 08:44 AM 11/17/98 -0800, Scott Luebking wrote: >Hi, Jon >What is the process for deciding what items are assigned priority 1? >Is there an online vote? Is it resolved in the conference calls? >The face-to-face? > >With regards to the table serialization, is it possible to do a >"straw vote" to see where people are at? If there is enough >interest, I can write up about serialization of tables for the guidelines, >but I would rather not use my time if the interest is lacking. > >Scott > Jon Gunderson, Ph.D., ATP Coordinator of Assistive Communication and Information Technology Division of Rehabilitation - Education Services University of Illinois at Urbana/Champaign 1207 S. Oak Street Champaign, IL 61820 Voice: 217-244-5870 Fax: 217-333-0248 E-mail: jongund@uiuc.edu WWW: http://www.staff.uiuc.edu/~jongund http://www.als.uiuc.edu/InfoTechAccess
Received on Tuesday, 17 November 1998 13:01:26 UTC