- From: Al Gilman <asgilman@access.digex.net>
- Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1998 15:15:03 -0500 (EST)
- To: ij@w3.org (Ian Jacobs)
- Cc: charlesn@srl.rmit.EDU.AU, w3c-wai-ua@w3.org
to follow up on what Ian Jacobs said: > > 7.1 Support accessibility features of HTML > > LANG is priority 3. I would have thought it was 2 at least. > > As it is priority 2 in the PAGL as well, I will change it > to 2 here if no one protests. OK, I object. What is the rationale for how it rates a 2? Seems to me LANG doesn't vary that often and if the user has to tell the Braille software manually what language to expect, for example, that it is not a real show-stopper. Not that I don't think browsers should support LANG. Just that the argument from disability access is weak. Al
Received on Thursday, 12 November 1998 15:15:23 UTC