- From: Philipp Hoschka <ph@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 07 Oct 1998 22:54:14 +0200
- To: w3c-wai-ua@w3.org
- cc: symm@w3.org
following up on an action item at todays UI guidelines telecon, i reviewed the following issue (symm copied for archival purposes, please include it in possible reponses): >#3. SMIL needs to be extended to be able to handle audio descriptions of >video images (see sample of suggested code below) -- Agreed, and the method >you propose looks good to me, although I would want to be sure that it is a >solution that is easy to implement. Could other people please review and >comment on this - Philipp, George, Geoff? ...I also think that we need a >mechanism for text descriptions of video images, which my original draft >didn't deal with adequately. > 3. User should be able to identify and turn on and off audio descriptions > of video objects. [Priority one] > - Rationale: Users who cannot see a video media object need a non-visual > way to identify that an audio description is available. > - Technique: Provide a standard mechanism for notifying third party > assistive technologies (e.g. screen-reading software) of the existence of > an audio description for a video object. Provide a mechanism (which can > function non-visually) for turning on or off the audio i agree with llyod's analysis that letting the user switch audio descriptions of video on and off requires introducing a new test attribute (see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/1998JulSep/0246.html for lloyd's comments) the method he proposes in this message looks good and implementable to me (the proposal is to introduce "system-audio-desc" as a new test attribute via a namespace as an intermediate solution, and considering it for inclusion in a future version of SMIL) SYMM folks: for an example of what descriptive video is, have a look at geoff freed's G2 demos: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-smil/1998JulSep/0025.html
Received on Wednesday, 7 October 1998 16:54:18 UTC