- From: Lloyd Rutledge <Lloyd.Rutledge@cwi.nl>
- Date: Thu, 01 Oct 1998 10:43:00 +0200
- To: Judy Brewer <jbrewer@w3.org>
- cc: w3c-wai-ua@w3.org, Jon Gunderson <jongund@staff.uiuc.edu>, allan_jm@tsb1.tsbvi.edu, hoschka@w3.org, kerscher@montana.com, cindy.king@gallaudet.edu, robla@real.com, Dick.Bulterman@cwi.nl, Lynda.Hardman@cwi.nl, Lloyd.Rutledge@cwi.nl, Geoff_Freed@wgbh.org
On Wed, Sep 30 1998 Judy Brewer wrote: > > > 8. User should be able to reposition captions. [Priority two] > > > - Rationale: Some multi-media presentations will include positioning > > > conflicts between captions which can obscure key visual elements of video > > > media objects. > > > - Technique: Provide mechanisms to control caption display location > > > dynamically and through user preferences. > > > > This could be handled by switch statements that choose between > > alternate screen layout specifications whose selection is based on > > SMIL test attributes that refer to user characteristics, such as > > system-captions and the system-audio-desc attribute proposed in this > > message. > > #8. Repositioning of captions could be handled by switch statements... -- > Unclear here. Would captions that are overlaid on video media object be > controllable in this manner, or is the idea that user preferences should > require captions to be displayed elsewhere than on top of a video media > object? The switch statement described above chooses between a layout without captions and another layout with captions. Here, both layouts are specified by the author, not the user. This enables both layouts with the look-and-feel the author desires, which would include making sure not visual conflicts occur. What the user has control over is simply which layout to use. This author-centered adaptation is based on the perception that proper overall layout for all adaptation is best handled by the author because it is (currently) too complex a problem (though it is the topic of some current research) to have the system figure out at runtime to reconfigure the layout in a way that avoid conflicts when the user places a screen object at any position. But one can have a special place for captions in a presentation system, perhaps a separate window, for example. One way to extend SMIL to handle such presentation-time inclusion and positioning of media is with the idea of "channels". Rather than, or perhaps in addition to, being placed in a layout region, captioning could be assigned to a channel, which represents an abstract presentation peripheral. At presentation time the system decides how to handle this and other types of channels. Channels enable a lot of adaptation and could solve other accessibility problems as well if introduced into SMIL. -Lloyd -- Lloyd Rutledge vox: +31 20 592 41 27 CWI (Centrum voor Wiskunde en Informatica) fax: +31 20 592 41 99 Kruislaan 413, NL-1098 SJ Amsterdam, The Netherlands net: lloyd@cwi.nl P.O. Box 94079, NL-1090 GB Amsterdam, The Netherlands http://www.cwi.nl/~lloyd
Received on Thursday, 1 October 1998 04:44:07 UTC