- From: Wayne Dick <wayneedick@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 28 May 2021 13:32:26 -0700
- To: David Woolley <forums@david-woolley.me.uk>
- Cc: W3C WAI ig <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAJeQ8SAcc2QUJAou--UzChWjhmBi3E1KpA7iXOB0BEUgueg_8w@mail.gmail.com>
Most of us have seen people and companies change for the better after entering the W3C community. We all have learned from each other. I have always thought of the W3C as a place where people and organizations who care and have a stake in the outcome can communicate to find solutions to difficult social and technical issues. I don't think of us as enforcers but more as negotiators, and problem solvers. The W3C is careful and thoughtful and that attitude is contagious in its members. The Web is a huge world resource and I think of the W3C as caretakers. Best, Wayne On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 12:35 PM David Woolley <forums@david-woolley.me.uk> wrote: > On 28/05/2021 19:19, Patrick H. Lauke wrote: > > It's up to working groups, the chairs, team contacts, and individuals in > > the working groups to make sure that member organisation representatives > > act in good faith. And due to the documented process, it *should* not > > come to situations where members can explicitly sabotage or derail the > > work inside working groups. > > It seems to me this is more a trade mark licensing issue > <https://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/2002/trademark-license-20021231>, > in particular: > > "4 Marks may not be used to indicate any kind of endorsement by the W3C, > official status with respect to the W3C, or any kind of relationship > with the W3C..." > > as might happen if the logo was included on an organisation's "Our > partners" page. > >
Received on Friday, 28 May 2021 20:33:17 UTC