- From: Shawn Henry <shawn@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 27 May 2021 15:52:48 -0500
- To: Karen Lewellen <klewellen@shellworld.net>, w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Hi, Karen, The Code document includes some of that information directly and links to other: * Section 4: Reporting Violations and Supporting the Code https://www.w3.org/Consortium/cepc/#Reporting * "Procedures" in Positive Work Environment Home Page https://www.w3.org/Consortium/pwe/ Best, ~Shawn On 27-May-21 3:39 PM, Karen Lewellen wrote: > I can respect your stance. > may I ask how the w3c insures anyone complies with this code of ethics? > By which I mean, is it possible to join, yet engage in the sorts of behavior illustrated by some posts here, without anyone the wiser? > Thanks, > Karen, > > > > On Thu, 27 May 2021, Patrick H. Lauke wrote: > >> I actually have concerns about this discussion. I'm sure going over the list of current members https://www.w3.org/Consortium/Member/List each of us can find at least one or two current members that don't, in our view, fit our view of a good actor - maybe they are in the cryptocurrency market, or maybe they're tied to a media company heavily invested in embedding DRM schemes into standards, or maybe they're tied to a particular government body that is actively working on the suppression of free speech, or ... >> >> However, under the rules, as long as they behave in accordance with the membership agreement, and follow the code of ethics and professional conduct https://www.w3.org/Consortium/cepc/ (and as long as they pay their membership fees), they are free to join. >> >> P >> -- >> Patrick H. Lauke >> >> https: //www.splintered.co.uk/ | https://github.com/patrickhlauke >> https: //flickr.com/photos/redux/ | https://www.deviantart.com/redux >> twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke >> >> >> >
Received on Thursday, 27 May 2021 20:52:56 UTC