- From: Louise Lister <Louise.Lister@iop.org>
- Date: Thu, 27 May 2021 15:51:46 +0000
- To: "Patrick H. Lauke" <redux@splintered.co.uk>, "w3c-wai-ig@w3.org" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <LO2P123MB174463FDD0E643F1AD6207DDEA239@LO2P123MB1744.GBRP123.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Oh I see sorry, so still a <blockquote> but within an aside! -----Original Message----- From: Louise Lister Sent: 27 May 2021 16:47 To: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>; w3c-wai-ig@w3.org Subject: RE: Using the block quote for magazine-style pull quotes >>Also, for what it's worth, <blockquote> doesn't require a cite attribute. It's perfectly valid without it. If Monsido flags this as a hard failure (of something?) then it's wrong (or very opinionated). Thanks Patrick! I think it's misleading in Monsido because the pass example does have a cite attribute and the fail example doesn't! However, does that mean we should still use an <aside> over a <blockquote> because the copy is pulled out of the main content itself? The block quote places everything in the main body of copy, so it's not sitting in a little coloured side panel or anything. Kind regards Louise -----Original Message----- From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk> Sent: 27 May 2021 16:38 To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org Subject: Re: Using the block quote for magazine-style pull quotes On 27/05/2021 16:02, John Foliot wrote: > FWIW, I'd recommend using the <aside> element instead. <blockquote> inside an <aside> Also, for what it's worth, <blockquote> doesn't require a cite attribute. It's perfectly valid without it. If Monsido flags this as a hard failure (of something?) then it's wrong (or very opinionated). P -- Patrick H. Lauke https://gbr01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.splintered.co.uk%2F&data=04%7C01%7Clouise.lister%40iop.org%7C373b3a4d53e840e24df708d92125ac59%7C8b8986af18bb4882a149fa5a3dd1f995%7C0%7C0%7C637577267966366486%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=m%2Fouu2cHqwAIbTDmfVulXneat9ONTMEqBMFTQ1VuWj0%3D&reserved=0 | https://gbr01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fpatrickhlauke&data=04%7C01%7Clouise.lister%40iop.org%7C373b3a4d53e840e24df708d92125ac59%7C8b8986af18bb4882a149fa5a3dd1f995%7C0%7C0%7C637577267966366486%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=eAu6mTLhVfTTZ1HaSYcKM2qWBvjutVqNz1Aatvh%2BZ2I%3D&reserved=0 https://gbr01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fflickr.com%2Fphotos%2Fredux%2F&data=04%7C01%7Clouise.lister%40iop.org%7C373b3a4d53e840e24df708d92125ac59%7C8b8986af18bb4882a149fa5a3dd1f995%7C0%7C0%7C637577267966376488%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=E47hJ4IwWgaRszy3Rp%2F5TLz2g0AFuQy1dX1sx4AKMUI%3D&reserved=0 | https://gbr01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.deviantart.com%2Fredux&data=04%7C01%7Clouise.lister%40iop.org%7C373b3a4d53e840e24df708d92125ac59%7C8b8986af18bb4882a149fa5a3dd1f995%7C0%7C0%7C637577267966376488%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=zh3h%2FVFvWKfDXXQqnA7hikcbtgODOj67SDFjCm7b0tw%3D&reserved=0 twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke This email (and attachments) are confidential and intended for the addressee(s) only. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender, delete any copies and do not take action in reliance on it. Any views expressed are the author's and do not represent those of IOP, except where specifically stated. IOP takes reasonable precautions to protect against viruses but accepts no responsibility for loss or damage arising from virus infection. For the protection of IOP's systems and staff emails are scanned automatically. Institute of Physics. Registered charity no. 293851 (England & Wales) and SCO40092 (Scotland) Registered Office: 37 Caledonian Road, London, N1 9BU
Received on Thursday, 27 May 2021 15:52:05 UTC