- From: Ragupathy Ramasamy <meragu87@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2021 17:53:38 +0530
- To: "Patrick H. Lauke" <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Cc: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAJnxbDeiPAJyZybzY=qssjJauNGWhfq6gzi0ZdYx3Yrt=Q6qFQ@mail.gmail.com>
Many thanks. Regards, Ragu On Tue, 13 Apr, 2021, 2:54 PM Patrick H. Lauke, <redux@splintered.co.uk> wrote: > On 13/04/2021 09:57, Ragupathy Ramasamy wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > The current inline link, or links embedded in a paragraph, are not > > receiving underlined by default. They get an underline and color change > > on hover. An example can be found below. Do we need to add underlines to > > our inline links or is the > 3:1 contrast ratio & underline on-hover > > sufficient? and It is a violation or not? > > Based on the understanding (which has recently been tweaked) for 1.4.1 > Use of Color (see second note in the intent) > https://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG21/Understanding/use-of-color.html the > contrast of 3:1 or better between link text and regular text colour is > sufficient to pass the SC (as it then counts as more than just > colour/hue, and it's a difference of luminosity as well). > > Of course, passing the SC is only reaching the bare minimum. I'd still > recommend, if possible, adding some further visual indicator to > differentiate regular text and links, going above and beyond the "this > technically passes" requirement. > > P > -- > Patrick H. Lauke > > https://www.splintered.co.uk/ | https://github.com/patrickhlauke > https://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | https://www.deviantart.com/redux > twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke > >
Received on Tuesday, 13 April 2021 12:24:08 UTC