- From: Charles 'chaals' (McCathie) Nevile <chaals@yandex.ru>
- Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2018 12:59:22 +0100
- To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
- Message-ID: <op.zt0gw8wyag6dn2@chaalss-macbook-pro.local>
On Fri, 14 Dec 2018 12:42:14 +0100, Subramanian, Poornima (PCL) <psubramanian@hagroup.com> wrote: > > From the WCAG SC 1.4.3 below, the scenario (highlighted text) given > under exception category to this contrast requirement. Yes. I think that's a bug, and the exception should be removed. :( > > Though sometimes, the ‘disabled’ attribute coded on (useful to know) > form fields e.g. ‘Continue to next step’, ‘Add to cart’, the >elements > are considered as ‘inactive UI element’ until it become enabled for > action. > > And coding ‘disabled’ or ‘aria-disabled’ are mainly for screen reader > interpretation purpose, the visual clue of showing as ‘disabled >with > dull color’ still serve good to understand its state (disabled / > enabled). My experience as a user is that this is untrue - often it is not clear that something is disabled from its "dull color", leading to significant frustration. cheers Chaals > > Once it is enabled, it must satisfy the minimum contrast ratio. > > However if there are other ways to show this visually without impacting > the color requirement from design perspective, am also >curious to know > about it. > > > 1.4.3 Contrast (Minimum): The visual presentation of text and images of > text has a contrast ratio of at least 4.5:1, except >for the following: > (Level AA) > > > Large Text: Large-scale text and images of large-scale text have a > contrast ratio of at least 3:1; > > > Incidental: Text or images of text that are part of an inactive user > interface component, that are pure decoration, >that are not visible to > anyone, or that are part of a picture that contains significant other > visual content, have no >contrast requirement. > > > Logotypes: Text that is part of a logo or brand name has no minimum > contrast requirement. > > > Thank you! > > > Best, > > Poornima. > > From: Harry Loots [mailto:harry.loots@ieee.org]Sent: Friday, December > 14, 2018 2:20 AM > To: W3C WAI ig <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org> > Subject: Disabled form fields > > > Dear all > > > My understanding of SC 1.4.3 (Contrast) is that disabled form fields > should also be subject to minimum contrast levels, since these fields > may >provide pertinent information to the user. > > Example from Google Material Design assets: > > > > > What is the view of this group? > > > Kindest regards > > Harry > >The information contained in this email and any attachment may be > confidential and/or legally privileged and has been sent for the sole > use of the intended recipient. >If you are not an intended recipient, > you are not authorized to review, use, disclose or copy any of its > contents. If you have received this email in error please reply to >the > sender and destroy all copies of the message. Thank you. > To the extent that the matters contained in this email relate to > services being provided by Princess Cruises and/or Holland America Line > (together "HA Group") to >Carnival Australia/P&O Cruises Australia, HA > Group is providing these services under the terms of a Services > Agreement between HA Group and Carnival Australia. -- Using Opera's mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
Received on Friday, 14 December 2018 11:59:50 UTC