- From: David Woolley <forums@david-woolley.me.uk>
- Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2011 07:51:06 +0000
- To: 'wai-ig list' <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Ramón Corominas wrote: > And not all "decorative" images should be inserted via CSS. For example, if the image is a printer icon next to a "print" text, the code of the link could be: > > <a href="..." title="Print this page"> > <img src="ico-print.png" alt="" /> Print > </a> One problem with this is that it is an abuse of links. I'm not sure if that particular use has gained squatters' rights, but a link is a noun, whereas this is a verb, and a title is additional information about what the link leads to, not a description of what it does, and certainly not a "tooltip". The button element was introduced in HTML 4 to cover this case, but, unfortunately was originally implemented in broken form by IE and had no fallback mechanism for older browsers. I would suggest that, from the point of view of people with congitive disabilities, any button that is not a form component will cause difficulties. One of the biggest problems for this class of user, including elderly first time users, is working out the design metaphor to be able to recognize the logical buttons. -- David Woolley Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want. RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam, that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.
Received on Thursday, 3 November 2011 07:51:48 UTC