- From: Ramón Corominas <listas@ramoncorominas.com>
- Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2011 01:43:28 +0100
- To: "w3c-wai-ig@w3.org" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
And not all "decorative" images should be inserted via CSS. For example, if the image is a printer icon next to a "print" text, the code of the link could be: <a href="..." title="Print this page"> <img src="ico-print.png" alt="" /> Print </a> This way, the icon will still be visinle with high contrast settings (css backgrounds disappear), and can also be resized if the user increases the text size. In ant case, I also agree that many images *are* decorative because their only purpose is to enhance presentation,and not to convey any relevant information, even if they are not strictly "borders or lines". Regards, Ramón. Patrick said: > On 02/11/2011 21:14, Userite wrote: >> I am having real problems with a client who insist that certain images >> are decorative and can therefore be given a null alt tag as per H67. I >> can accept that a squiggly line or fancy text box border is decorative, >> but not a largish picture of a building (no particular building, just a >> museum type facade). > > So what's the purpose of the image? To just look pretty and add some visual interest? In that case, I'd say an empty alt *attribute* is fair enough (others will argue against it, but that's what you get) as long as the text also reflects the same "tone" that the image is trying to convey. > >> I really think that it is time to remove H67 as a technique, either a >> non-text item such as an image should have a text equivalent, or it >> should not be imported by HTML but be treated as styling and imported >> via CSS so that it is totally ignored by screen readers etc. This way >> there is no need for subjective discussions. > > All you'd get then is designers and developers avoiding any and all accessibility discussion by simply making ALL their images CSS-based and only having lots of empty divs and spans in their page where they then insert images via stylesheet... > > P > -- > Patrick H. Lauke > ______________________________________________________________ > re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively > [latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.] > > www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk > http://redux.deviantart.com | http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ > ______________________________________________________________ > twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke > ______________________________________________________________ >
Received on Thursday, 3 November 2011 00:46:38 UTC