- From: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2011 21:55:44 -0700
- To: Userite <richard@userite.com>
- Cc: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Received on Thursday, 3 November 2011 04:56:41 UTC
Hi Richard, the list of cases where an a null alt should be used in "HTML5: Techniques for providing useful text alternatives" [1] may be helpful in understanding why disallowing inline img elements with null attributes is not practical. [1] http://dev.w3.org/html5/alt-techniques/#secm3 Regards Stevef On 2 November 2011 14:14, Userite <richard@userite.com> wrote: > I am having real problems with a client who insist that certain images > are decorative and can therefore be given a null alt tag as per H67. I can > accept that a squiggly line or fancy text box border is decorative, but not > a largish picture of a building (no particular building, just a museum type > facade). > I really think that it is time to remove H67 as a technique, either a > non-text item such as an image should have a text equivalent, or it should > not be imported by HTML but be treated as styling and imported via CSS so > that it is totally ignored by screen readers etc. This way there is no need > for subjective discussions. > > Any thoughts ? > Richard > Richard Warren > Userite >
Received on Thursday, 3 November 2011 04:56:41 UTC