- From: Clarkson, Ann <clarksona@caboolture.qld.gov.au>
- Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 08:05:00 +1000
- To: "David Woolley" <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>, <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
>>The problem I think you will have is that the supplier will have spent so much on "upgrading" their web site to make it bad that they will either find it cheaper to give your money back or they will try to argue that it is you that is forcing the change and you should bear all their resulting costs.<< You're probably right. However, this software is very expensive, and to lose us for a single year would cost them a lot more than it would cost them to fix their templates, so I'm hopeful of getting them to listen. ;-) >>It sounds as though this is not a small detail that can be cheaply fixed but that you are challenging the whole basis of their design, which their designers will probably claim is "best" modern practice (although one can make a good claim that frames ceased to be that half a decade ago!) They will probably argue that the old design is poor because it is not modern.<< No doubt their designers will put that argument. This is one reason I came here, to get ammunition for my arguments in favour of their making the changes to good design. >>It's probably that neither their other customers nor their management and marketing people are aware of the implications of accessibility on web design, so they won't believe that they need to change.<< I think you're right there, and I am happy to tell them. Their customers as well if necessary. If they try to fob us off (my manager is fully supportive of this initiative, having fought to get compliance with the existing version), I can always get support from the other users. It's a small market, and I know many of the other users, so if the worst comes to the worst, I can drum up support. Thanks to you and others here who have supplied good information for me to use in my dealings with them. ***************************************************** This email communication and any attachments is intended for the named recipient only; it may contain confidential information or privileged information. If you are not the named recipient you have received this email and any attachments in error. You must not use, disclose, on forward, copy or distribute any information contained in this email or any attachments. Please delete all copies of this email immediately and contact the sender to advise of the error. It is recommended that you scan this email and any attachment before opening. Caboolture Shire Council does not accept any responsibility for any damage or loss arising directly from opening this email or any attachments. The views expressed in this email and any attachments are the personal views of the sender unless otherwise stated. *****************************************************
Received on Sunday, 16 July 2006 22:05:17 UTC