- From: T. V. Raman <raman@Adobe.COM>
- Date: Wed, 26 Nov 1997 07:58:58 -0800
- To: Jason White <jasonw@ariel.ucs.unimelb.EDU.AU>
- Cc: WAI HC Working Group <w3c-wai-hc@w3.org>
This discussion is losing sight of the forest while wandering around the trees. An XML document in general will have far richer information than an HTML 4.0 document. I think it is a wasteful exercise to speculate on how one would transform an XML document to an HTML 4.0 document in the name of accessibility since a Braille or audio style sheet (especially an aural style sheet) will do much much better with the richer tagging available in the XML document. This said, the rest of the world will probably do the XML -> html4.0 transform one way or the other simply to be able to quickly display XML documents. This said, just because ICADD projected documents down to a very simple DTD in the name of accessibility doesn't mean that that was either completely correct or the right way to proceed. Keep in mind that ICADD in its design was primarily motivated on designing a DTD that would allow electronic documents to be converted to a fairly simple minded etext format for reading with screenreaders or for translation to a simple Braille scheme. Things like tree transformation are powerful ideas and whatever XSL provides in this area will help us produce much more usable presentations for all. However, it would be detrimental to focus on projecting rich information structure to any given DTD --ICADD, HTML4.0 or whatever else. Each of those systems are dated in their own right and contain design compromises that newer systems should not try to drag along. So in summary think of XML/XSL in its own right rather than trying to limit the design by what has gone before. -- Best Regards, --raman Adobe Systems Tel: 1 (408) 536 3945 (W14-129) Advanced Technology Group Fax: 1 (408) 537 4042 (W14 129) 345 Park Avenue Email: raman@adobe.com San Jose , CA 95110 -2704 Email: raman@cs.cornell.edu http://labrador.corp.adobe.com/~raman/ (Adobe Intranet) http://cs.cornell.edu/home/raman/raman.html (Cornell) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Disclaimer: The opinions expressed are my own and in no way should be taken as representative of my employer, Adobe Systems Inc. ____________________________________________________________
Received on Wednesday, 26 November 1997 10:57:44 UTC