- From: MegaZone <megazone@livingston.com>
- Date: Wed, 29 Oct 1997 20:11:01 -0800 (PST)
- To: w3c-wai-hc@w3.org, w3c-html-wg@w3.org
Once upon a time Scott Isaacs shaped the electrons to say... >1) nested value lists (my example from much earlier) 'value' can be used to differentiate values when sent to the server, as always. >2) multi-columns >3) rich HTML items These are deliberately not handled. This is not meant as an end all, be all complete solution to all hierachical navigation everyone might ever want to do. It handles common cases, and does so in such a way that is backwards compatible with the installed base. We considered this of prime importance. Future development of a *new* element that has the kitchen sink is something to consider after 4.0. But we (the HC) do not agree that this implementation interferes with the possibility of a new element in the future. It may be deprecated later, or it may be a viable alternative for those who wish to maintain compatibility with older UAs for some time to come. But it is a workable solution *today* for 4.0, and we've found no valid counter argumentsu. >4) mult-select for hierarchy I'm not clear on what what you mean here. You can select multiple items... >5) Individually checked items similar to a menu Handling should be no different from 'multiple' in today's SELECT. >6) Disabling of items or nested groups Both OPTGROUP and OPTION have 'disabled' as an attribute. -MZ -- Livingston Enterprises - Chair, Department of Interstitial Affairs Phone: 800-458-9966 510-737-2100 FAX: 510-737-2110 megazone@livingston.com For support requests: support@livingston.com <http://www.livingston.com/> Snail mail: 4464 Willow Road, Pleasanton, CA 94588
Received on Wednesday, 29 October 1997 23:18:04 UTC