Re: SELECT structures with lots of OPTIONs

to follow up on what Dave Raggett said:

> Please let me know if you feel this is a sufficient priority
> for HTML 4.0. We would have to put a clear case to the HTML-WG
> togther with our proposal. Something which doesn't effect 
> the code for visual browsers would be easier to get agreement
> on.

My sense is that this is in the middle zone of priority where the
full consultative process is required to find the right choice of

It is important enough for the disabled users so that we as the
HC tiger team should not quietly take it off the table.  But we
need to substantiate the importance through discussing the issue
with the IG.  And we could wind up deciding that we don't want to
go for a 4.0 change because anything we can negotiate at this
late date is incompatible with what we really want to do

-- Al

Received on Thursday, 9 October 1997 09:39:53 UTC