Re: CFC - Target Size (min) SC

Conditional +1

(noting Jon Avila's spelling concern, and Wilco's phrasing concern - both
minor editorial issues that need to be resolved)

JF

On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 4:33 AM Wilco Fiers <wilco.fiers@deque.com> wrote:

> +1
>
> Although I did just notice a small point; Targets don't *have* an area,
> targets *are* an area. On the first sentence, I think I'd prefer reusing
> the wording of 2.5.5 "The size of the target for pointer inputs is at least
> 24 by 24 CSS pixels except when". I'll open an issue for it. We can revisit.
>
> On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 10:45 PM Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Call For Consensus — ends 9th April at noon Boston time.
>>
>>
>>
>> The Working Group has discussed the WCAG 2.2 success criteria “Target
>> Size (Minimum)”, the latest version can be seen here:
>>
>> https://w3c.github.io/wcag/understanding/target-size-minimum.html
>>
>>
>>
>> Survey of issues and responses:
>>
>> https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/wcag22-target-spacing-issues/results
>>
>>
>>
>> Previous minutes include:
>>
>> https://www.w3.org/2021/04/06-ag-minutes.html#t02
>>
>> https://www.w3.org/2021/03/30-ag-minutes.html#item04
>>
>> https://www.w3.org/2021/03/02-ag-minutes.html#item03
>>
>>
>>
>> If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not
>> been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not
>> being able to live with” this decision, please let the group know before
>> the CfC deadline.
>>
>>
>>
>> Kind regards,
>>
>>
>>
>> -Alastair
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>>
>> @alastc / www.nomensa.com
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> *Wilco Fiers*
> Axe-core product owner - Facilitator ACT Task Force - Co-chair ACT-Rules
>
>
>

Received on Wednesday, 7 April 2021 11:44:29 UTC