- From: John Foliot <john@foliot.ca>
- Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2021 07:43:37 -0400
- To: Wilco Fiers <wilco.fiers@deque.com>
- Cc: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>, "WCAG list (w3c-wai-gl@w3.org)" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAKdCpxzrQoMkQKwFP2w9gyT5sQjost7W85ToBAQP5x1HeKVEbQ@mail.gmail.com>
Conditional +1 (noting Jon Avila's spelling concern, and Wilco's phrasing concern - both minor editorial issues that need to be resolved) JF On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 4:33 AM Wilco Fiers <wilco.fiers@deque.com> wrote: > +1 > > Although I did just notice a small point; Targets don't *have* an area, > targets *are* an area. On the first sentence, I think I'd prefer reusing > the wording of 2.5.5 "The size of the target for pointer inputs is at least > 24 by 24 CSS pixels except when". I'll open an issue for it. We can revisit. > > On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 10:45 PM Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com> > wrote: > >> Call For Consensus — ends 9th April at noon Boston time. >> >> >> >> The Working Group has discussed the WCAG 2.2 success criteria “Target >> Size (Minimum)”, the latest version can be seen here: >> >> https://w3c.github.io/wcag/understanding/target-size-minimum.html >> >> >> >> Survey of issues and responses: >> >> https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/wcag22-target-spacing-issues/results >> >> >> >> Previous minutes include: >> >> https://www.w3.org/2021/04/06-ag-minutes.html#t02 >> >> https://www.w3.org/2021/03/30-ag-minutes.html#item04 >> >> https://www.w3.org/2021/03/02-ag-minutes.html#item03 >> >> >> >> If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not >> been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not >> being able to live with” this decision, please let the group know before >> the CfC deadline. >> >> >> >> Kind regards, >> >> >> >> -Alastair >> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> >> @alastc / www.nomensa.com >> >> >> > > > -- > *Wilco Fiers* > Axe-core product owner - Facilitator ACT Task Force - Co-chair ACT-Rules > > >
Received on Wednesday, 7 April 2021 11:44:29 UTC