RE: CFC - Target Size (min) SC

+1

Thx,

ND


From: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
Sent: Tuesday, April 6, 2021 1:46 PM
To: WCAG list (w3c-wai-gl@w3.org) <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] CFC - Target Size (min) SC
Importance: High


Call For Consensus - ends 9th April at noon Boston time.



The Working Group has discussed the WCAG 2.2 success criteria "Target Size (Minimum)", the latest version can be seen here:

https://w3c.github.io/wcag/understanding/target-size-minimum.html<https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fw3c.github.io%2Fwcag%2Funderstanding%2Ftarget-size-minimum.html&data=04%7C01%7Cnidogbo%40microsoft.com%7Cc65419a9034e48dc08ba08d8f93cf91f%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637533387570689113%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=fOzkYP58hoG74GgTiarHdqF0ifeTFw6GeaClAjmBSu4%3D&reserved=0>



Survey of issues and responses:

https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/wcag22-target-spacing-issues/results<https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2002%2F09%2Fwbs%2F35422%2Fwcag22-target-spacing-issues%2Fresults&data=04%7C01%7Cnidogbo%40microsoft.com%7Cc65419a9034e48dc08ba08d8f93cf91f%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637533387570699114%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=A9g9pxa%2FvXbY8pZVG%2B21cAzpknyCKFbeMivEZqIK1xc%3D&reserved=0>



Previous minutes include:

https://www.w3.org/2021/04/06-ag-minutes.html#t02<https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2021%2F04%2F06-ag-minutes.html%23t02&data=04%7C01%7Cnidogbo%40microsoft.com%7Cc65419a9034e48dc08ba08d8f93cf91f%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637533387570709108%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=BnTEVIwY6Vg4D7o5hIrJ9ecMy3gsFwT23X9xF%2F2RaUs%3D&reserved=0>

https://www.w3.org/2021/03/30-ag-minutes.html#item04<https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2021%2F03%2F30-ag-minutes.html%23item04&data=04%7C01%7Cnidogbo%40microsoft.com%7Cc65419a9034e48dc08ba08d8f93cf91f%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637533387570719099%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=Bvv5tNe1yBjSJMDHlnpOeF7bUrq20LF5dkUFrNsMaXo%3D&reserved=0>

https://www.w3.org/2021/03/02-ag-minutes.html#item03<https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2021%2F03%2F02-ag-minutes.html%23item03&data=04%7C01%7Cnidogbo%40microsoft.com%7Cc65419a9034e48dc08ba08d8f93cf91f%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637533387570719099%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=hmZm3p4uN1ajTyEXQY0i6Tce%2BPNGXtn8QB2x8jNObqo%3D&reserved=0>



If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you "not being able to live with" this decision, please let the group know before the CfC deadline.

Kind regards,

-Alastair

--

@alastc / www.nomensa.com<https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nomensa.com%2F&data=04%7C01%7Cnidogbo%40microsoft.com%7Cc65419a9034e48dc08ba08d8f93cf91f%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637533387570729094%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=PtH5Drxz57I1YDYBLYbG%2FBGvN6W949IdCW82U0mWIzA%3D&reserved=0>