Re: Target size proposal

On 17/01/2018 09:54, Abma, J.D. (Jake) wrote:
> Even more so, if MS adds to the target area we now have 3 different sizes: Apple 44, Google 48 and MS 34 (or 42 depending on if the 8 is total OR added to AND top AND bottom)

Caveat: it may be that I misinterpreted what Microsoft have said about 
spacing/margin - I'm only going by that email, the fact that it 
referenced recent versions of Office, and what actually happens in 
Office 2013 when switching between mouse/touch optimized interface (i.e. 
it adds padding to the target size, not spacing *around* the target 
size). Maybe Alex Li can clarify this further.

Patrick H. Lauke | |
twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke

Received on Wednesday, 17 January 2018 11:12:23 UTC