Re[2]: Target size proposal

------ Original Message ------
From: "Patrick H. Lauke" <>
To: "" <>

>On 17/01/2018 09:54, Abma, J.D. (Jake) wrote:
>>Even more so, if MS adds to the target area we now have 3 different 
>>sizes: Apple 44, Google 48 and MS 34 (or 42 depending on if the 8 is 
>>total OR added to AND top AND bottom)
>Caveat: it may be that I misinterpreted what Microsoft have said about 
>spacing/margin - I'm only going by that email, the fact that it 
>referenced recent versions of Office, and what actually happens in 
>Office 2013 when switching between mouse/touch optimized interface 
>(i.e. it adds padding to the target size, not spacing *around* the 
>target size). Maybe Alex Li can clarify this further.
Indeed - but we should make this quick..



>-- Patrick H. Lauke
> |
> |
>twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke

Received on Wednesday, 17 January 2018 12:52:34 UTC