- From: Joshue O Connor - InterAccess <josh@interaccess.ie>
- Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2018 12:52:05 +0000
- To: "Patrick H. Lauke" <redux@splintered.co.uk>, "w3c-wai-gl@w3.org" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
------ Original Message ------ From: "Patrick H. Lauke" <redux@splintered.co.uk> To: "w3c-wai-gl@w3.org" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> [...] >On 17/01/2018 09:54, Abma, J.D. (Jake) wrote: >> >>Even more so, if MS adds to the target area we now have 3 different >>sizes: Apple 44, Google 48 and MS 34 (or 42 depending on if the 8 is >>total OR added to AND top AND bottom) > >Caveat: it may be that I misinterpreted what Microsoft have said about >spacing/margin - I'm only going by that email, the fact that it >referenced recent versions of Office, and what actually happens in >Office 2013 when switching between mouse/touch optimized interface >(i.e. it adds padding to the target size, not spacing *around* the >target size). Maybe Alex Li can clarify this further. > Indeed - but we should make this quick.. Thanks Josh > >P >-- Patrick H. Lauke > >www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke >http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com >twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke >
Received on Wednesday, 17 January 2018 12:52:34 UTC