W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > January to March 2018

Re[2]: Target size proposal

From: Joshue O Connor - InterAccess <josh@interaccess.ie>
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2018 12:52:05 +0000
To: "Patrick H. Lauke" <redux@splintered.co.uk>, "w3c-wai-gl@w3.org" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Message-Id: <em86998c1b-c152-4828-9dfa-9b12768f79a3@desktop-rg9a92j>
------ Original Message ------
From: "Patrick H. Lauke" <redux@splintered.co.uk>
To: "w3c-wai-gl@w3.org" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>

>On 17/01/2018 09:54, Abma, J.D. (Jake) wrote:
>>Even more so, if MS adds to the target area we now have 3 different 
>>sizes: Apple 44, Google 48 and MS 34 (or 42 depending on if the 8 is 
>>total OR added to AND top AND bottom)
>Caveat: it may be that I misinterpreted what Microsoft have said about 
>spacing/margin - I'm only going by that email, the fact that it 
>referenced recent versions of Office, and what actually happens in 
>Office 2013 when switching between mouse/touch optimized interface 
>(i.e. it adds padding to the target size, not spacing *around* the 
>target size). Maybe Alex Li can clarify this further.
Indeed - but we should make this quick..



>-- Patrick H. Lauke
>www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke
>http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com
>twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
Received on Wednesday, 17 January 2018 12:52:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 21:08:21 UTC