- From: Kerstin Probiesch <k.probiesch@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 23:01:03 +0200
- To: David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>
- Cc: Gregg Vanderheiden <gregg@raisingthefloor.org>, Katie Haritos-Shea <ryladog@gmail.com>, Jonathan Avila <jon.avila@ssbbartgroup.com>, Allen Hoffman <allen.hoffman@hq.dhs.gov>, GLWAI Guidelines WG org <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAC6E-ZhCvDLxfHi3XTeYL5_zdPFGFaCp4T-v+1eW7vRLD0cNGw@mail.gmail.com>
+1 (much better) - for consistency we need I believe a "due to" Suggestions for examples: Example 1: Information about the author or authors are just placed in headers or footers. Example 2: Billing addresses and/or contact informations are just placed in headers or footers. Example 3: Information about categories of single articles are just placed in headers or footers and not for example in the table of contents. 2015-06-10 22:48 GMT+02:00 David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>: > I don't think we need the word "important" > > Failure: Information in the header or footer is not presented at least > once in the main body of the document or is not programmatically > determinable. > > > Cheers, > > David MacDonald > > > > *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.* > > Tel: 613.235.4902 > > LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100> > > www.Can-Adapt.com > > > > * Adapting the web to all users* > * Including those with disabilities* > > If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy > <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html> > > On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 4:17 PM, Gregg Vanderheiden < > gregg@raisingthefloor.org> wrote: > >> is “important” a testable term. too subjective to be a failure? >> (fails to meet the “always a failure” test for failures?) >> >> *gregg* >> >> ---------------------------------- >> Gregg Vanderheiden >> gregg@raisingthefloor.org >> >> >> >> >> On Jun 10, 2015, at 3:10 PM, Kerstin Probiesch <k.probiesch@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> what I'm thinking about is adding a failure technique: important >> information is just placed in headers or footers. What is an "important" >> information? >> >> Just two examples: >> >> # information about the author is just placed in footer. >> >> # contact informations are just placed in headers or footers and not >> elsewhere in the document >> >> By adding a failure technique we I believe could adress different user >> preferences but make sure that important informations which are placed just >> in headers or footers will fail the SC. >> >> Cheers >> >> Kerstin >> >> >> >> >> # >> >> >> >> Am 10.06.2015 um 20:40 schrieb Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL < >> ryladog@gmail.com>: >> >> +1 >> >> >> >> ** katie ** >> >> *Katie Haritos-Shea* >> *Senior Accessibility SME (WCAG/Section 508/ADA/AODA)* >> >> *Cell: 703-371-5545 <703-371-5545> **|* *ryladog@gmail.com* >> <ryladog@gmail.com> *|* *Oakton, VA **|* *LinkedIn Profile* >> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/katieharitosshea/> *|* *Office: 703-371-5545 >> <703-371-5545>* >> >> *From:* Gregg Vanderheiden [mailto:gregg@raisingthefloor.org >> <gregg@raisingthefloor.org>] >> *Sent:* Wednesday, June 10, 2015 2:38 PM >> *To:* Jonathan Avila >> *Cc:* Allen Hoffman; David MacDonald; GLWAI Guidelines WG org >> *Subject:* Re: Should PDF documents have headers and footers on every >> page? >> >> +1 >> >> *gregg* >> >> >> >> On Jun 10, 2015, at 1:35 PM, Jonathan Avila <jon.avila@ssbbartgroup.com> >> wrote: >> >> So this issue is very much a user preference and thus flexibility should >> be afforded to the user to choose which way they want information provided. >> >> >> >
Received on Wednesday, 10 June 2015 21:01:31 UTC