W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > April to June 2015

Re: Should PDF documents have headers and footers on every page?

From: David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 17:41:15 -0400
Message-ID: <BLU436-SMTP21C92C3F9F7575A52BDEB0FEBD0@phx.gbl>
To: Kerstin Probiesch <k.probiesch@gmail.com>
CC: Gregg Vanderheiden <gregg@raisingthefloor.org>, Katie Haritos-Shea <ryladog@gmail.com>, Jonathan Avila <jon.avila@ssbbartgroup.com>, Allen Hoffman <allen.hoffman@hq.dhs.gov>, GLWAI Guidelines WG org <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Example 4
Page numbers in footer don't match page numbers in document page panel.

Cheers,

David MacDonald



*Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*

Tel:  613.235.4902

LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>

www.Can-Adapt.com



*  Adapting the web to all users*
*            Including those with disabilities*

If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
<http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>

On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 5:01 PM, Kerstin Probiesch <k.probiesch@gmail.com>
wrote:

> +1 (much better) - for consistency we need I believe a "due to"
>
> Suggestions for examples:
>
>
> Example 1:
>
> Information about the author or authors are just placed in headers or
> footers.
>
> Example 2:
>
> Billing addresses and/or contact informations are just placed in headers
> or footers.
>
> Example 3:
>
> Information about categories of single articles are just placed in headers
> or footers and not for example in the table of contents.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 2015-06-10 22:48 GMT+02:00 David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>:
>
>> I don't think we need the word "important"
>>
>> Failure: Information in the header or footer is not presented at least
>> once in the main body of the document or is not programmatically
>> determinable.
>>
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> David MacDonald
>>
>>
>>
>> *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*
>>
>> Tel:  613.235.4902
>>
>> LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>
>>
>> www.Can-Adapt.com
>>
>>
>>
>> *  Adapting the web to all users*
>> *            Including those with disabilities*
>>
>> If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
>> <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 4:17 PM, Gregg Vanderheiden <
>> gregg@raisingthefloor.org> wrote:
>>
>>>  is  “important”   a testable term.     too subjective to be a failure?
>>>   (fails to meet the “always a failure” test for failures?)
>>>
>>> *gregg*
>>>
>>> ----------------------------------
>>> Gregg Vanderheiden
>>> gregg@raisingthefloor.org
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Jun 10, 2015, at 3:10 PM, Kerstin Probiesch <k.probiesch@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> what I'm thinking about is adding a failure technique: important
>>> information is just placed in headers or footers. What is an "important"
>>> information?
>>>
>>> Just two examples:
>>>
>>> # information about the author is just placed in footer.
>>>
>>> # contact informations are just placed in headers or footers and not
>>> elsewhere in the document
>>>
>>> By adding a failure technique we I believe could adress different user
>>> preferences but make sure that important informations which are placed just
>>> in headers or footers will fail the SC.
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>>
>>> Kerstin
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> #
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Am 10.06.2015 um 20:40 schrieb Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL <
>>> ryladog@gmail.com>:
>>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ** katie **
>>>
>>> *Katie Haritos-Shea*
>>>  *Senior Accessibility SME (WCAG/Section 508/ADA/AODA)*
>>>
>>> *Cell: 703-371-5545 <703-371-5545> **|* *ryladog@gmail.com*
>>> <ryladog@gmail.com> *|* *Oakton, VA **|* *LinkedIn Profile*
>>> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/katieharitosshea/> *|* *Office:
>>> 703-371-5545 <703-371-5545>*
>>>
>>> *From:* Gregg Vanderheiden [mailto:gregg@raisingthefloor.org
>>> <gregg@raisingthefloor.org>]
>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, June 10, 2015 2:38 PM
>>> *To:* Jonathan Avila
>>> *Cc:* Allen Hoffman; David MacDonald; GLWAI Guidelines WG org
>>> *Subject:* Re: Should PDF documents have headers and footers on every
>>> page?
>>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> *gregg*
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Jun 10, 2015, at 1:35 PM, Jonathan Avila <jon.avila@ssbbartgroup.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> So this issue is very much a user preference and thus flexibility should
>>> be afforded to the user to choose which way they want information provided.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
Received on Wednesday, 10 June 2015 21:41:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 16 January 2018 15:34:19 UTC