- From: David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>
- Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 17:41:15 -0400
- To: Kerstin Probiesch <k.probiesch@gmail.com>
- CC: Gregg Vanderheiden <gregg@raisingthefloor.org>, Katie Haritos-Shea <ryladog@gmail.com>, Jonathan Avila <jon.avila@ssbbartgroup.com>, Allen Hoffman <allen.hoffman@hq.dhs.gov>, GLWAI Guidelines WG org <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <BLU436-SMTP21C92C3F9F7575A52BDEB0FEBD0@phx.gbl>
Example 4 Page numbers in footer don't match page numbers in document page panel. Cheers, David MacDonald *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.* Tel: 613.235.4902 LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100> www.Can-Adapt.com * Adapting the web to all users* * Including those with disabilities* If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html> On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 5:01 PM, Kerstin Probiesch <k.probiesch@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 (much better) - for consistency we need I believe a "due to" > > Suggestions for examples: > > > Example 1: > > Information about the author or authors are just placed in headers or > footers. > > Example 2: > > Billing addresses and/or contact informations are just placed in headers > or footers. > > Example 3: > > Information about categories of single articles are just placed in headers > or footers and not for example in the table of contents. > > > > > > > > > 2015-06-10 22:48 GMT+02:00 David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>: > >> I don't think we need the word "important" >> >> Failure: Information in the header or footer is not presented at least >> once in the main body of the document or is not programmatically >> determinable. >> >> >> Cheers, >> >> David MacDonald >> >> >> >> *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.* >> >> Tel: 613.235.4902 >> >> LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100> >> >> www.Can-Adapt.com >> >> >> >> * Adapting the web to all users* >> * Including those with disabilities* >> >> If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy >> <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html> >> >> On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 4:17 PM, Gregg Vanderheiden < >> gregg@raisingthefloor.org> wrote: >> >>> is “important” a testable term. too subjective to be a failure? >>> (fails to meet the “always a failure” test for failures?) >>> >>> *gregg* >>> >>> ---------------------------------- >>> Gregg Vanderheiden >>> gregg@raisingthefloor.org >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Jun 10, 2015, at 3:10 PM, Kerstin Probiesch <k.probiesch@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> what I'm thinking about is adding a failure technique: important >>> information is just placed in headers or footers. What is an "important" >>> information? >>> >>> Just two examples: >>> >>> # information about the author is just placed in footer. >>> >>> # contact informations are just placed in headers or footers and not >>> elsewhere in the document >>> >>> By adding a failure technique we I believe could adress different user >>> preferences but make sure that important informations which are placed just >>> in headers or footers will fail the SC. >>> >>> Cheers >>> >>> Kerstin >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> # >>> >>> >>> >>> Am 10.06.2015 um 20:40 schrieb Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL < >>> ryladog@gmail.com>: >>> >>> +1 >>> >>> >>> >>> ** katie ** >>> >>> *Katie Haritos-Shea* >>> *Senior Accessibility SME (WCAG/Section 508/ADA/AODA)* >>> >>> *Cell: 703-371-5545 <703-371-5545> **|* *ryladog@gmail.com* >>> <ryladog@gmail.com> *|* *Oakton, VA **|* *LinkedIn Profile* >>> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/katieharitosshea/> *|* *Office: >>> 703-371-5545 <703-371-5545>* >>> >>> *From:* Gregg Vanderheiden [mailto:gregg@raisingthefloor.org >>> <gregg@raisingthefloor.org>] >>> *Sent:* Wednesday, June 10, 2015 2:38 PM >>> *To:* Jonathan Avila >>> *Cc:* Allen Hoffman; David MacDonald; GLWAI Guidelines WG org >>> *Subject:* Re: Should PDF documents have headers and footers on every >>> page? >>> >>> +1 >>> >>> *gregg* >>> >>> >>> >>> On Jun 10, 2015, at 1:35 PM, Jonathan Avila <jon.avila@ssbbartgroup.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> So this issue is very much a user preference and thus flexibility should >>> be afforded to the user to choose which way they want information provided. >>> >>> >>> >> >
Received on Wednesday, 10 June 2015 21:41:48 UTC