- From: David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>
- Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 16:48:36 -0400
- To: Gregg Vanderheiden <gregg@raisingthefloor.org>
- CC: Kerstin Probiesch <k.probiesch@gmail.com>, Katie Haritos-Shea <ryladog@gmail.com>, Jonathan Avila <jon.avila@ssbbartgroup.com>, Allen Hoffman <allen.hoffman@hq.dhs.gov>, GLWAI Guidelines WG org <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <BLU437-SMTP104B8B124A0C1B80899E417FEBD0@phx.gbl>
I don't think we need the word "important" Failure: Information in the header or footer is not presented at least once in the main body of the document or is not programmatically determinable. Cheers, David MacDonald *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.* Tel: 613.235.4902 LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100> www.Can-Adapt.com * Adapting the web to all users* * Including those with disabilities* If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html> On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 4:17 PM, Gregg Vanderheiden < gregg@raisingthefloor.org> wrote: > is “important” a testable term. too subjective to be a failure? > (fails to meet the “always a failure” test for failures?) > > *gregg* > > ---------------------------------- > Gregg Vanderheiden > gregg@raisingthefloor.org > > > > > On Jun 10, 2015, at 3:10 PM, Kerstin Probiesch <k.probiesch@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Hi all, > > what I'm thinking about is adding a failure technique: important > information is just placed in headers or footers. What is an "important" > information? > > Just two examples: > > # information about the author is just placed in footer. > > # contact informations are just placed in headers or footers and not > elsewhere in the document > > By adding a failure technique we I believe could adress different user > preferences but make sure that important informations which are placed just > in headers or footers will fail the SC. > > Cheers > > Kerstin > > > > > # > > > > Am 10.06.2015 um 20:40 schrieb Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL <ryladog@gmail.com > >: > > +1 > > > > ** katie ** > > *Katie Haritos-Shea* > *Senior Accessibility SME (WCAG/Section 508/ADA/AODA)* > > *Cell: 703-371-5545 <703-371-5545> **|* *ryladog@gmail.com* > <ryladog@gmail.com> *|* *Oakton, VA **|* *LinkedIn Profile* > <http://www.linkedin.com/in/katieharitosshea/> *|* *Office: 703-371-5545 > <703-371-5545>* > > *From:* Gregg Vanderheiden [mailto:gregg@raisingthefloor.org > <gregg@raisingthefloor.org>] > *Sent:* Wednesday, June 10, 2015 2:38 PM > *To:* Jonathan Avila > *Cc:* Allen Hoffman; David MacDonald; GLWAI Guidelines WG org > *Subject:* Re: Should PDF documents have headers and footers on every > page? > > +1 > > *gregg* > > > > On Jun 10, 2015, at 1:35 PM, Jonathan Avila <jon.avila@ssbbartgroup.com> > wrote: > > So this issue is very much a user preference and thus flexibility should > be afforded to the user to choose which way they want information provided. > > >
Received on Wednesday, 10 June 2015 20:49:08 UTC