W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > April to June 2015

Re: Should PDF documents have headers and footers on every page?

From: David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 16:42:15 -0400
Message-ID: <BLU437-SMTP107A2C1F109A3C21FDEF9D9FEBD0@phx.gbl>
To: Kerstin Probiesch <k.probiesch@gmail.com>
CC: Gregg Vanderheiden <gregg@raisingthefloor.org>, Katie Haritos-Shea <ryladog@gmail.com>, Jonathan Avila <jon.avila@ssbbartgroup.com>, Allen Hoffman <allen.hoffman@hq.dhs.gov>, GLWAI Guidelines WG org <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
+1

Cheers,

David MacDonald



*Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*

Tel:  613.235.4902

LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>

www.Can-Adapt.com



*  Adapting the web to all users*
*            Including those with disabilities*

If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
<http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>

On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 4:20 PM, Kerstin Probiesch <k.probiesch@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Of course "important" is not a good term - I'm sure we can find a better
> one...
>
>
>
> Am 10.06.2015 um 22:17 schrieb Gregg Vanderheiden <
> gregg@raisingthefloor.org>:
>
>  is  “important”   a testable term.     too subjective to be a failure?
> (fails to meet the “always a failure” test for failures?)
>
> *gregg*
>
> ----------------------------------
> Gregg Vanderheiden
> gregg@raisingthefloor.org
>
>
>
>
> On Jun 10, 2015, at 3:10 PM, Kerstin Probiesch <k.probiesch@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> what I'm thinking about is adding a failure technique: important
> information is just placed in headers or footers. What is an "important"
> information?
>
> Just two examples:
>
> # information about the author is just placed in footer.
>
> # contact informations are just placed in headers or footers and not
> elsewhere in the document
>
> By adding a failure technique we I believe could adress different user
> preferences but make sure that important informations which are placed just
> in headers or footers will fail the SC.
>
> Cheers
>
> Kerstin
>
>
>
>
> #
>
>
>
> Am 10.06.2015 um 20:40 schrieb Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL <ryladog@gmail.com
> >:
>
> +1
>
>
>
> ** katie **
>
> *Katie Haritos-Shea*
>  *Senior Accessibility SME (WCAG/Section 508/ADA/AODA)*
>
> *Cell: 703-371-5545 <703-371-5545> **|* *ryladog@gmail.com*
> <ryladog@gmail.com> *|* *Oakton, VA **|* *LinkedIn Profile*
> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/katieharitosshea/> *|* *Office: 703-371-5545
> <703-371-5545>*
>
> *From:* Gregg Vanderheiden [mailto:gregg@raisingthefloor.org
> <gregg@raisingthefloor.org>]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, June 10, 2015 2:38 PM
> *To:* Jonathan Avila
> *Cc:* Allen Hoffman; David MacDonald; GLWAI Guidelines WG org
> *Subject:* Re: Should PDF documents have headers and footers on every
> page?
>
> +1
>
> *gregg*
>
>
>
> On Jun 10, 2015, at 1:35 PM, Jonathan Avila <jon.avila@ssbbartgroup.com>
> wrote:
>
> So this issue is very much a user preference and thus flexibility should
> be afforded to the user to choose which way they want information provided.
>
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 10 June 2015 20:42:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 16 January 2018 15:34:19 UTC