is “important” a testable term. too subjective to be a failure? (fails to meet the “always a failure” test for failures?) gregg ---------------------------------- Gregg Vanderheiden gregg@raisingthefloor.org > On Jun 10, 2015, at 3:10 PM, Kerstin Probiesch <k.probiesch@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi all, > > what I'm thinking about is adding a failure technique: important information is just placed in headers or footers. What is an "important" information? > > Just two examples: > > # information about the author is just placed in footer. > > # contact informations are just placed in headers or footers and not elsewhere in the document > > By adding a failure technique we I believe could adress different user preferences but make sure that important informations which are placed just in headers or footers will fail the SC. > > Cheers > > Kerstin > > > > > # > > > > Am 10.06.2015 um 20:40 schrieb Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL <ryladog@gmail.com <mailto:ryladog@gmail.com>>: > >> +1 <> >> >> >> >> * katie * >> >> Katie Haritos-Shea >> Senior Accessibility SME (WCAG/Section 508/ADA/AODA) >> >> Cell: 703-371-5545 | ryladog@gmail.com <mailto:ryladog@gmail.com> | Oakton, VA | LinkedIn Profile <http://www.linkedin.com/in/katieharitosshea/> | Office: 703-371-5545 >> >> From: Gregg Vanderheiden [mailto:gregg@raisingthefloor.org <mailto:gregg@raisingthefloor.org>] >> Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2015 2:38 PM >> To: Jonathan Avila >> Cc: Allen Hoffman; David MacDonald; GLWAI Guidelines WG org >> Subject: Re: Should PDF documents have headers and footers on every page? >> >> +1 >> >> gregg >> >> >> On Jun 10, 2015, at 1:35 PM, Jonathan Avila <jon.avila@ssbbartgroup.com <mailto:jon.avila@ssbbartgroup.com>> wrote: >> >> So this issue is very much a user preference and thus flexibility should be afforded to the user to choose which way they want information provided.
Received on Wednesday, 10 June 2015 20:17:36 UTC