RE: Conformance, Aggregation and Captions Survey for 12 April 2007 from Bailey Bruce on 2007-04-12 (w3c-wai-gl@w3.org from April to June 2007)

From: Bailey Bruce <Bailey@Access-Board.gov>
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 14:34:17 -0400
To: "WCAG-WG" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Message-ID: <23EB0B5A59FF804E9A219B2C4EF3AE3D8E2AF5@Access-Exch.Access-Board.gov>

> I don't think that just saying that the Chrome is compliant is not
enough.

Agreed.  This is why I think it is essential that WCAG 2.0 (could be an
SC, scope, or baseline) require that the site owner (aggregator) provide
for the *possibility* of submitting accessible content.

Received on Thursday, 12 April 2007 18:32:24 UTC