RE: Conformance, Aggregation and Captions Survey for 12 April 2007

> I don't think that just saying that the Chrome is compliant is not
enough.

Agreed.  This is why I think it is essential that WCAG 2.0 (could be an
SC, scope, or baseline) require that the site owner (aggregator) provide
for the *possibility* of submitting accessible content.

Received on Thursday, 12 April 2007 18:32:24 UTC