- From: Bailey Bruce <Bailey@Access-Board.gov>
- Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 14:34:17 -0400
- To: "WCAG-WG" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
> I don't think that just saying that the Chrome is compliant is not enough. Agreed. This is why I think it is essential that WCAG 2.0 (could be an SC, scope, or baseline) require that the site owner (aggregator) provide for the *possibility* of submitting accessible content.
Received on Thursday, 12 April 2007 18:32:24 UTC