- From: Bailey Bruce <Bailey@Access-Board.gov>
- Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 14:20:26 -0400
- To: "WCAG-WG" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 12 April 2007 18:18:33 UTC
Thanks. Yes, I meant ATAG. I am of the opinion that WCAG 2.0 should reference and endorse ATAG. That seems more important to me than the the control/ownership/moderation question. ________________________________ From: Loretta Guarino Reid [mailto:lorettaguarino@google.com] Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2007 12:40 PM To: Bailey Bruce Cc: WCAG-WG Subject: Re: Conformance, Aggregation and Captions Survey for 12 April 2007 I think it moves us more and more into the sphere of authoring tools and ATAG. I would rather see someone evaluating such Web pages against ATAG explicitly, and just evaluate the results for WCAG. Loretta
Received on Thursday, 12 April 2007 18:18:33 UTC