W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > April to June 2007

RE: Conformance, Aggregation and Captions Survey for 12 April 2007

From: Bailey Bruce <Bailey@Access-Board.gov>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 19:46:25 -0400
Message-ID: <23EB0B5A59FF804E9A219B2C4EF3AE3D44FFED@Access-Exch.Access-Board.gov>
To: "WCAG-WG" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>

For sake of argument, let us assume we go with the most liberal (i.e.,
potentially least accessible) of the proposals:
1. Conforms at level 1 where controlled 
2. No 3rd party content is controlled 

Is there still the expectation (for WCAG 2.0 Single A claim) that the
aggregator explicitly provide a mechanism for the 3rd party content to
be accessible (even if it is not forced).  For example, if an aggregator
allows uploading of photos, must they provide a text field for ALT
value?  If an aggregator allows uploading of video, must they provide a
means to provide synchronized captions?  If so, is this a separate SC or
part of the conformance scoping?
Received on Wednesday, 11 April 2007 23:44:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:32:36 UTC