- From: Bailey Bruce <Bailey@Access-Board.gov>
- Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 19:46:25 -0400
- To: "WCAG-WG" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
For sake of argument, let us assume we go with the most liberal (i.e., potentially least accessible) of the proposals: <blockquote> 1. Conforms at level 1 where controlled 2. No 3rd party content is controlled </blockquote> Is there still the expectation (for WCAG 2.0 Single A claim) that the aggregator explicitly provide a mechanism for the 3rd party content to be accessible (even if it is not forced). For example, if an aggregator allows uploading of photos, must they provide a text field for ALT value? If an aggregator allows uploading of video, must they provide a means to provide synchronized captions? If so, is this a separate SC or part of the conformance scoping?
Received on Wednesday, 11 April 2007 23:44:14 UTC