- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 02:39:45 -0400 (EDT)
- To: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
- cc: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Specifically not specificy. I would suggest the final sentence as This can be done using text on the page, or through the use of metadata (EARL [reference] is an example technique). Also, it isn't just recommended, it is required for level 2 conformance. And can the information be provided in user-readable format on a different page? Does there need to be an explicit linkage? (level-2 conformant Mobile phone content will not, I hope, have its WCAG conformance information in the page...) cheers Charles On Thu, 25 Apr 2002, Gregg Vanderheiden wrote: The last sentence in the new WCAG 2.0 in the conformance section is acatually a sentence fragment. The sentence as intended is written below. I am posting to the list for discussion before adding to the document. 3. It is possible and recommended that sites report specificy which criteria they have met within each of the guidelines and checkpoints. This can be done using explicit text on the page or RDF/EARL (or other Metadata approach?).
Received on Friday, 26 April 2002 02:39:46 UTC