- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 03:06:23 -0400 (EDT)
- To: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
- cc: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
What about The WCAG group wants to make sure that people whose content conforms to WCAG 1.0 can make it conform to WCAG 2.0 as easily as possible. The group is trying to make WCAG 2.0 clearer and easier to use for a wide range of technology. But the two versions work from the same general principles. To show how to apply WCAG 2.0 for content that conforms to WCAG 1.0 there is a mapping from checkpoints in WCAG 1.0 to the requirements of WCAG 2.0. Chaals On Thu, 25 Apr 2002, Gregg Vanderheiden wrote: - I see what you mean. This doesn't read well does it. but we need to say that there won't be a whole new set of rules... what about: The Web Content Accessibility Guidelines Working Group is working carefully to enable organizations and individuals that have adopted WCAG 1.0 in the past to make a smooth transition to WCAG 2.0. To facilitate this WCAG 2.0 is being designed to be a clearer, less technology specific version of the same principles found in 1.0. To see how the two relate please refer to the Checkpoint Mapping Between WCAG 1.0 and WCAG 2.0 Working Draft. Current wording The WCAG Working Group is proceeding carefully to minimize substantial differences between the WCAG 1.0 Recommendation and the WCAG 2.0 Working Draft. Refer to the Checkpoint Mapping Between WCAG 1.0 and WCAG 2.0 Working Draft for more detail on current correspondences. [js: If the goal is to "minimize substantial differences" between 1.0 and 2.0 there's no reason to spend time creating 2.0. I would propose something like the following language: The Web Content Accessibility Guidelines Working Group is working carefully to enable organizations and individuals that have adopted WCAG 1.0 in the past to make a smooth transition to WCAG 2.0. To facilitate this transition, please refer to the Checkpoint Mapping Between WCAG 1.0 and WCAG 2.0 Working Draft for more detail on current correspondences.] -- ------------------------------ Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. Professor - Human Factors Depts of Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr. Director - Trace R & D Center University of Wisconsin-Madison Gv@trace.wisc.edu <mailto:Gv@trace.wisc.edu>, <http://trace.wisc.edu/> FAX 608/262-8848 For a list of our listserves send "lists" to listproc@trace.wisc.edu <mailto:listproc@trace.wisc.edu> -- Charles McCathieNevile http://www.w3.org/People/Charles phone: +61 409 134 136 W3C Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI fax: +33 4 92 38 78 22 Location: 21 Mitchell street FOOTSCRAY Vic 3011, Australia (or W3C INRIA, Route des Lucioles, BP 93, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France)
Received on Friday, 26 April 2002 03:06:23 UTC