- From: Gregg Vanderheiden <GV@TRACE.WISC.EDU>
- Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 22:43:29 -0500
- To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
- Message-id: <002101c1ecd4$886b2670$e1366880@laptop600>
Current wording: Orientation/Navigation. Facilitate content orientation and navigation [js: How about something like this: "Orientation and navigation. Provide contextual information and interface elements to facilitate orientation to and navigation through Web content, and ensure that these mechanisms can be perceived and used by any user, either directly or with the aid of assistive technology."?] GV: I think we just want to say what should be done - and save the HOW for the checkpoints. Current wording: Comprehendible. [js: Change to: Comprehensible. Rationale: "Comprehendible" isn't good English.] GV: GOOD - DONE. Current wording: Technology robust [js: Change to: Robust technology.] GV: hmmm. This is supposed to describe the page. So I think Technology Robust works better doesn't it? -- ------------------------------ Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. Professor - Human Factors Depts of Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr. Director - Trace R & D Center University of Wisconsin-Madison Gv@trace.wisc.edu < <mailto:Gv@trace.wisc.edu> mailto:Gv@trace.wisc.edu>, < <http://trace.wisc.edu/> http://trace.wisc.edu/> FAX 608/262-8848 For a list of our listserves send "lists" to listproc@trace.wisc.edu < <mailto:listproc@trace.wisc.edu> mailto:listproc@trace.wisc.edu>
Received on Thursday, 25 April 2002 23:44:29 UTC