Re: Fwd: Re: Removing 2.3 Technique

I don't believe the rationale has lost favor and we could add that back
into the Techniques document discussion of site maps.
--w

At 08:01 PM 2/24/99 , Al Gilman wrote:
>At one point the tail end of the Techniques contained a paragraph
>suggesting that the site guide be made especially accessible, with the
>reasoning roughly as below.
>
>I went back to the document to cite it and found it gone.  
>
>Was this because the idea lost favor, or is it an artifact of shortening up
>the whole work?
>
>Al
>
>>Resent-Date: Wed, 24 Feb 1999 20:29:46 -0500 (EST)
>>X-Sender: 10003479@iad@pop.iamdigex.net
>>X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.0
>>Date: Wed, 24 Feb 1999 20:32:08 -0500
>>To: Jan Richards <jan.richards@utoronto.ca>,
>>        "w3c-wai-ua@w3.org" <w3c-wai-ua@w3.org>
>>From: Al Gilman <asgilman@iamdigex.net>
>>Subject: Re: Removing 2.3 Technique
>>Resent-From: w3c-wai-ua@w3.org
>>X-Mailing-List: <w3c-wai-ua@w3.org> archive/latest/1155
>>X-Loop: w3c-wai-ua@w3.org
>>Sender: w3c-wai-ua-request@w3.org
>>Resent-Sender: w3c-wai-ua-request@w3.org
>>
>>At 07:59 PM 2/24/99 -0500, Jan Richards wrote:
>>>In 2.3 the following technique should be removed:
>>>
>>>Produce text representations for site maps generated by the authoring
>>>tool. 
>>>
>>>Producing text site maps seems to be no more or less important than any
>>>other inserted information.
>>
>>The site guide is the safety net behind the navigation and orientation
>>information spread through the site.  This could lead one to feel it is
>>more important than your average chunk of content.  If you're lost; this is
>>where you go to get found.
>>
>>Al
>> 
> 

Received on Sunday, 14 March 1999 13:37:00 UTC