Fwd: Re: Removing 2.3 Technique

At one point the tail end of the Techniques contained a paragraph
suggesting that the site guide be made especially accessible, with the
reasoning roughly as below.

I went back to the document to cite it and found it gone.  

Was this because the idea lost favor, or is it an artifact of shortening up
the whole work?

Al

>Resent-Date: Wed, 24 Feb 1999 20:29:46 -0500 (EST)
>X-Sender: 10003479@iad@pop.iamdigex.net
>X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.0
>Date: Wed, 24 Feb 1999 20:32:08 -0500
>To: Jan Richards <jan.richards@utoronto.ca>,
>        "w3c-wai-ua@w3.org" <w3c-wai-ua@w3.org>
>From: Al Gilman <asgilman@iamdigex.net>
>Subject: Re: Removing 2.3 Technique
>Resent-From: w3c-wai-ua@w3.org
>X-Mailing-List: <w3c-wai-ua@w3.org> archive/latest/1155
>X-Loop: w3c-wai-ua@w3.org
>Sender: w3c-wai-ua-request@w3.org
>Resent-Sender: w3c-wai-ua-request@w3.org
>
>At 07:59 PM 2/24/99 -0500, Jan Richards wrote:
>>In 2.3 the following technique should be removed:
>>
>>Produce text representations for site maps generated by the authoring
>>tool. 
>>
>>Producing text site maps seems to be no more or less important than any
>>other inserted information.
>
>The site guide is the safety net behind the navigation and orientation
>information spread through the site.  This could lead one to feel it is
>more important than your average chunk of content.  If you're lost; this is
>where you go to get found.
>
>Al
>

Received on Wednesday, 24 February 1999 20:59:07 UTC