Fwd: Re: Removing 2.3 Technique

At one point the tail end of the Techniques contained a paragraph
suggesting that the site guide be made especially accessible, with the
reasoning roughly as below.

I went back to the document to cite it and found it gone.  

Was this because the idea lost favor, or is it an artifact of shortening up
the whole work?


>Resent-Date: Wed, 24 Feb 1999 20:29:46 -0500 (EST)
>X-Sender: 10003479@iad@pop.iamdigex.net
>X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.0
>Date: Wed, 24 Feb 1999 20:32:08 -0500
>To: Jan Richards <jan.richards@utoronto.ca>,
>        "w3c-wai-ua@w3.org" <w3c-wai-ua@w3.org>
>From: Al Gilman <asgilman@iamdigex.net>
>Subject: Re: Removing 2.3 Technique
>Resent-From: w3c-wai-ua@w3.org
>X-Mailing-List: <w3c-wai-ua@w3.org> archive/latest/1155
>X-Loop: w3c-wai-ua@w3.org
>Sender: w3c-wai-ua-request@w3.org
>Resent-Sender: w3c-wai-ua-request@w3.org
>At 07:59 PM 2/24/99 -0500, Jan Richards wrote:
>>In 2.3 the following technique should be removed:
>>Produce text representations for site maps generated by the authoring
>>Producing text site maps seems to be no more or less important than any
>>other inserted information.
>The site guide is the safety net behind the navigation and orientation
>information spread through the site.  This could lead one to feel it is
>more important than your average chunk of content.  If you're lost; this is
>where you go to get found.

Received on Wednesday, 24 February 1999 20:59:07 UTC