- From: Daniel Dardailler <danield@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 13 Jan 1999 15:40:08 +0100
- To: Al Gilman <asgilman@iamdigex.net>
- cc: "Charles (Chuck) Oppermann" <chuckop@microsoft.com>, Jason White <jasonw@ariel.ucs.unimelb.EDU.AU>, WAI Markup Guidelines <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
> Note that this is the key question. So long as the DOM just mirrors what is > in W3C languages and the dynamic behavior is defined in language outside the > scope of the W3C specs, then the DOM can't do much to help us much with the > accessibility of Web dynamics. It can only close the barn door after the > horse is gone. Do you think W3C should endorse a particular scripting language as being more official ? ECMAScript would be my choice, but I have no idea if this is the most widely used, compared with JavaScript, JScript, VBScript, etc, or if this is something the industry is really rallying behind.
Received on Wednesday, 13 January 1999 09:40:30 UTC