- From: Helle Bjarnø <jor@servicestyrelsen.dk>
- Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 13:37:39 +0200
- To: "EOWG (E-mail)" <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>
Hi Sylvie and list I agree with Sylvie´s comment and support that we keep the "first" version. Cheers Helle Sincerely Helle Bjarnø, M.L I.Sc. Consultant Mobile: +45 41 73 08 02 E-mail: jor@servicestyrelsen.dk The National Board of Social Services, The National Centre of Knowledge on Disabilities and Social Psychiatry Landemaerket 9 DK-1119 København K Phone: +45 72 42 37 00 www.servicestyrelsen.dk Venlig hilsen Helle Bjarnø Faglig konsulent, synshandicap Direkte: +45 72 42 40 29 Mobil: +45 41 73 08 02 E-mail: jor@servicestyrelsen.dk SERVICESTYRELSEN Videnscenter for Handicap og Socialpsykiatri Landemærket 9 1119 København K Telefon: +45 72 42 41 00 www.servicestyrelsen.dk -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: w3c-wai-eo-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-eo-request@w3.org] På vegne af Sylvie Duchateau Sendt: 28. juli 2011 10:52 Til: Shawn Henry Cc: EOWG (E-mail) Emne: Re: updated: Business Case slides Hello Shawn and all, While comparing the 23 july and 25 july versions I prefer the first try. I think a quote (even from you!) is ok and the notes explain clearly what this quote is, that you can take an alternative one or choose one from a famous local person. Discussing the issue with a colleague, she was a bit surprised to read your quote in slide 5 of the 25 July version without quoting, without source, it looks strange. I think that the notes are not really helpful. To summarise: I vote for the solution of 23 July version and the really clear notes that explain this slide. One last question: For which version of the slides shall we vote now when we fill out the survey? Best Sylvie Sylvie Duchateau Association BrailleNet Tél.: +33(0] 1 44 27 26 25 Fax : +33 (0) 1 44 27 34 49 Web : http://www.accessiweb.org Le 25/07/2011 20:47, Shawn Henry a écrit : > EOWG, > > Based on the EOWG discussion on 22 July, I edited the [broad view of > accessibility] slide (5), changing the slide a bit and the Notes > significantly. After further input and thought, I was able to separate > out the issues more clearly. Currently the purpose of that slide is > introduce the first part of the presentation, not to have a compelling > quote. So I've tried another revision to better meet the purpose and > get rid of the quote issues. I look forward to your comments on how > these work or might be further revised. > > The two drafts are available for review: > * 25 July revision removing quotation aspects: > http://www.w3.org/WAI/presentations/bcase/bcase-presentation-format-2011-07July-25.ppt > * 23 July version with changes based on the 22 July EOWG decisions: > http://www.w3.org/WAI/presentations/bcase/bcase-presentation-format-2011-07July-23.ppt > > Note that the latest version (which currently is the same as the 25 > July one, but could change) will be at: > http://www.w3.org/WAI/presentations/bcase/bcase-presentation-format.ppt > > Thanks, > ~Shawn (with editor hat on) > > >
Received on Friday, 29 July 2011 11:38:08 UTC