- From: Pasquale Popolizio <pasquale@osservatoriosullacomunicazione.com>
- Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 18:00:58 +0200
- To: Shawn Henry <shawn@w3.org>, "EOWG (E-mail)" <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>
Hi Shawn, hi all. I agree with you; this document should be short. I think it's not important to include reference about "Notes". regards ciao ~ pasquale Il giorno 02/ago/06, alle ore 16:21, Shawn Henry ha scritto: > > My quick reactions: > - We want to keep this doc as short and focused as possible. > > - *Why* W3C uses "Recommendation" rather than "standard" I think is > out of scope. However, making it clear that W3C Recommendation = > standard I think is in scope to cover efficiently -- that is, not > have a long paragraph explaining it, but just something like: "W3C > Recommendation (Standard): ... W3C Recommendations are similar to > the standards published by other organizations." > > - I think we probably should include something about Notes; > however, I'm a little concerned about expanding the document. > EOWG, Comments? > Best, > ~Shawn
Received on Wednesday, 2 August 2006 16:01:21 UTC