- From: Alan Chuter <achuter@technosite.es>
- Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2006 09:36:40 +0200
- To: EOWG <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>
This is the first time I have seen this draft [1]. Reading the title ("WAI Standards in the W3C Process") and the introductory paragraph I expected to learn about how WAI intervenes in the process to ensure that accessibility issues are addressed, but that apparently isn't the intention. [1] http://www.w3.org/WAI/intro/w3c-process It seems that the immediate need is for a short-term document for now to inform about what's happening with WCAG 2.0 that can over time evolve into a long-term one about the progress of WAI documents in the process. Or perhaps more simply, some kind of "lastest news" note at the beginning saying that there is currently misunderstanding over WCAG 2.0 and the process, that can hopefully soon be removed when WCAG 2.0 becomes a recommendation. Here are some suggestions for the wording of the introductory paragraph. Basically, this is to explain what wasn't clear to me on first reading: about the two sections and how they relate to one another, and to clarify that the WAI Recommendations are listed to show where they are presently in the process: "The first section of this document provides a brief overview of the process that W3C documents go through in becoming a standard. The second lists W3C Recommendations completed and in progress in WAI Working Groups, and their current progress through the process described in the first section (at the time this document was last updated)." And a couple of other ideas: * Explain why W3C uses the term "Recommendation" rather than "standard". * Explain that there are also "Notes" that go through a different process but are integrated with the recommendations. best regards, -- Alan Chuter Accessibility Consultant Technosite (formerly Fundosa Teleservicios) achuter@technosite.es www.technosite.es Tel. +34 91 121 03 35
Received on Wednesday, 2 August 2006 07:37:47 UTC