- From: William Loughborough <love26@gorge.net>
- Date: Sat, 08 Jul 2006 06:19:31 -0700
- To: eowg <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>
I've been spouting the notion that ageing is itself a disability and here's an example. After yesterday's teleconference I went to the "urgent care" department of the Klickitat Valley Medical Center to find out why I have started noticing incidents of vertigo and during the process I was struck by how archaic the information handling in the medical industry is. At no time during the episode did I have access to my medical records and the process required me to, from memory, recite all 8 of the medications I take daily. If I weren't well known there it would also have included dealing with patronizing attitudes (which most old people encounter all the time) instead of the deference/respect I received. The same pattern of discrimination that is encountered with our client base emphasized (again/still!) how important it is to have the routine processes of society be accessible. For example, many of us from time to time use a Web-based email client and these often have little evidence of their authors having been the least bit concerned with accessibility either for the one composing or retrieving email. As we persist in trying to explain that every aspect of the Web is colored by the necessity of using what we call "authoring tools", that term holds little meaning for most people who use the Web and that in fact ALL INTERACTIONS WITH THE WEB ARE THROUGH SOMETHING WE ARE CALLING 'Authoring Tools'. Simply selecting what to show next on the screen is a form of authoring. We have so indiscriminately accepted even our own discriminative stereotyping that the very terms we use (even our carefully chosen politically correct ones) serve to perpetuate that there's some category separating us from one another and from the information that has become an ambient flood. One of our jobs is to kick out those walls of separation that make us ignore the process of marginaliz(s)ation of "Persons With Disbility" by making accessibility somehow separate from some mainstream process. We must try to let everyone know that at this time the only way to avoid inevitable membership in such demeaned groups as "seniors" or "the handicapped" is to die out. That ALL interaction with the Web needs to both be and produce accessible content is not widely understood. "They" don't really "get it" so what I'm proposing is more attitudinal reshaping at every level of interaction by those involved with the Web as "authors"/"users". In other words the technical details' elucidation through our Recommendations of separational factors should be in our consciousnesses as we promote the notion that whatever we do in this new world of interactivity doesn't shut out the "us" that includes Helen Keller, Steven Hawking, and Franklin Roosevelt. Love.
Received on Saturday, 8 July 2006 13:19:38 UTC