- From: William Loughborough <love26@gorge.net>
- Date: Sat, 01 Nov 2003 12:33:27 -0800
- To: "Roberto Castaldo" <r.castaldo@iol.it>, <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <5.2.0.9.2.20031101122606.02fe5c08@pop3.gorge.net>
At 08:06 PM 11/1/2003 +0100, Roberto Castaldo wrote: >...not only with people with disabilities. And I think we should emphasize >this. On the one hand: AMEN! On the other hand, the WAI (and by extension its EOWG) is specifically chartered to deal with this matter from the point of view of PWD, hence the constant (for several years anyway) spectacle of this point being addressed, re-addressed, and sort of endlessly hashed over. If you want to study the history of this discussion you can find a lot about it in the archives of this working group and perhaps even more extensively in the WCAG and ATAG working groups. We go over it, and over it, and... In general the final conclusion is that, for better or for worse, the decision has been (and probably continues to be) that our client base is purposely restricted to (and our efforts focused on) PWD. Issues of usability by everybody are mentioned, but deliberately not emphasized, and I think that's how it's gotta be. -- Love. It's Bad Luck to be Superstitious!
--- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.520 / Virus Database: 318 - Release Date: 9/18/2003
Received on Saturday, 1 November 2003 15:33:27 UTC