- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 05:18:53 -0400 (EDT)
- To: Helle Bjarnø <hbj@visinfo.dk>
- cc: "EOWG (E-mail)" <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>
Hi Helle, yes, I did note that message from Judy, and it is relevant. I thought it would be useful to have some test cases, and to carry out review of them, probably in conjunction with ERT and WCAG, as part of the development of that material. At the same time, I would still like to find some answers to the question "what sites would you put in a gallery", and document how the decision to include a site is made. cheers Charles On Tue, 17 Jul 2001, Helle Bjarnø wrote: Hi Charles The European Agency for Development in Special Needs Education http://www.european-agency.org/ has put the AAA conformance logo on their site. I did a Bobby check on the site last Friday and it came out with several priority 1 errors, haven't had time to try it with JAWS 3.5. My point is that stating compliance with the WCAG isn't necessarily the same as the site being accessible. In the EOWG we talked about this last Friday and have started work on the review/evaluation document. See Judy's email from 13.07.01: EOWG: First (raw!) draft of appendix on reviewing Web sites "I have put up a first draft of the appendix on evaluating sites for Web accessibility. Much of the content is derived from Appendix A of WCAG 1.0. I have a number of questions for our discussion today, with regard to how to make this section more effective.
Received on Tuesday, 17 July 2001 05:19:04 UTC