Re: 2. Scenarios of People with Disabilities Using the Web

I'm not concerned that there be more policy or business case - I think the
particular value of this note is to explain how it is that people use the
Web, and what it is that gives them access. (The times I have referred to it,
that is what I have needed from it...)

Cheers

Charles McCN

On Fri, 5 Jan 2001, William Loughborough wrote:

  At 07:51 AM 1/5/01 -0500, Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
  >is it more or less what you had in mind?

  If that question's for me the scenarios are rapidly becoming what I have in
  mind, particularly since they now contain material emphasizing that there's
  been (and continues to be) a problem here: not all is sweetness and light
  in the accessibility garden.

  The self-reflexive part is absent so far as I can tell and I don't really
  expect much to be done in that regard but I thought Jonathan might provide
  a scenario that used what he's always talking about which might argue for
  its inclusion in an otherwise entirely verbal experience for our readers.

  The only additional flavors I covet in the document are: 1) more noticeable
  i18n; 2) "policy" illustrations to supplement the "bizcase" and "curb-cut"
  arguments now peppering the scenarios.

  I think this is getting to be both a "good thing" and an exemplar of
  effective "concert composition".

  --
  Love.
                   ACCESSIBILITY IS RIGHT - NOT PRIVILEGE


-- 
Charles McCathieNevile    mailto:charles@w3.org    phone: +61 (0) 409 134 136
W3C Web Accessibility Initiative                      http://www.w3.org/WAI
Location: I-cubed, 110 Victoria Street, Carlton VIC 3053, Australia
until 6 January 2001 at:
W3C INRIA, 2004 Route des Lucioles, BP 93, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France

Received on Friday, 5 January 2001 17:40:49 UTC