- From: Robert Neff <rneff@bbnow.net>
- Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2001 12:11:47 -0500
- To: "Carlos A Velasco" <Carlos.Velasco-Nunez@gmd.de>, "WAI EO List" <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>
hey carlos, Seems i made sense on two of five comments. that is pretty good for me and am getting better <grin>. 1. good point on 'buy-in'. it is use frequently here in the united states and not sure how this would translate. the meaning is to obtain approval from all departments in a good way before so you can move forward. this is something that you work toward and may have to barter ideas, schedules, costs, or tasks to get everyone to agree. some items may be lsot in the process as you obtain concensus. that may be a better phrase 'obtain concensus". 2. a major part of implementation plan is identfying the resources and stating who needs to be part of this. another important part is to identify the 'asumptions and risks' as well as the 'depencies and constraints'. while it is true 'asumptions and risks' as well as the 'depencies and constraints' would be in the business case, the implementation plan would be read by another audience (remember the business case is normally for directors and executives, whereas the implementation plan is for their staff as they are the ones doing the work). hence i believe the plan's audience would want to see resources in there. cheers, rob
Received on Sunday, 22 April 2001 13:07:28 UTC