- From: <karl.hebenstreit@gsa.gov>
- Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2000 16:51:44 -0400
- To: w3c-wai-eo@w3.org
This will be a great resource, and is quite timely. As Judy and Chuck are aware, my office is providing auditorium-style training to webmasters in the federal government. Our next classes won't be until June 27th, so it might be possible for us to test some of these ideas on a large sample size (our first four sessions had about 450 registrants -- haven't had time to identify the number of actual attendees, and we have 14 more sessions scheduled). An additional resourcethat would be EXTREMELY useful would be to have "one-page" guides (print on a single piece of paper) on specific problem areas, such as PDF, Java, JavaScript, dynamic webpages. I would see this as an separate page, such as "Topic Guides", "Topics", or "Guides". Planning Good framework for training development. It's really a cyclical process where trainer perspectives can provide valuable feedback for determining needs and managing expectations Learning Objectives: What does the audience need? This should be part of any registration form/process. I can try to incorporate this into our online registration process (retroactively get feedback from people who have attended one of our first four sessions). I know we need to address the NOSCRIPT part of our registration form, but I'd welcome feedback on any outstanding accessibility issues: http://w3.gsa.gov/web/m/cita.nsf/CourseRegistration2?OpenForm Learning Objectives: What are the audience's learning objectives? This should be part of any registration and evaluation or feedback form/process. I can try to incorporate this into our online registration process (retroactively get feedback from people who have attended one of our first four sessions). Registration forms are much easier to deal with online than evaluation forms, unless participants each have access to a computer with web access. Resources and Approaches Great to have resources and approaches linked to specific learning objectives. Encouraging trainers to submit perspective documents could lead to additional learning objectives, and help identify more resources for each objective. Subsequent trainers would have more "raw" material readily available to use in their course, although our experience so far raises substantial issues with the need for printed and alternate format materials (we distributed about 300 copies of a 28-page, double-sided handout). What is the best method for providing alternate formats for a slide show presentation? Arranging Resources for Trainings Online or offline? Working offline requires extensive copying of all files (all graphics as well as HTML), although only copying the HTML file provides a clear indication of whether or not people are using ALT text since all images are "broken links". Online is particular effective if you include a live demonstration of real webpages by one or more people with disabilities. Having one or more representatives of the disability community presenting also provides better discussions, since they can relate actual experiences. Karl Hebenstreit, Jr. US General Services Administration Office of Governmentwide Policy Center for Information Technology Accommodation http://www.itpolicy.gsa.gov/cita Federal IT Accessibility Initiative http://www.section508.gov
Received on Thursday, 8 June 2000 17:01:08 UTC