- From: <karl.hebenstreit@gsa.gov>
- Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2000 16:51:44 -0400
- To: w3c-wai-eo@w3.org
This will be a great resource, and is quite timely. As Judy and Chuck are
aware, my office is providing auditorium-style training to webmasters in
the federal government. Our next classes won't be until June 27th, so it
might be possible for us to test some of these ideas on a large sample size
(our first four sessions had about 450 registrants -- haven't had time to
identify the number of actual attendees, and we have 14 more sessions
scheduled). An additional resourcethat would be EXTREMELY useful would
be to have "one-page" guides (print on a single piece of paper) on specific
problem areas, such as PDF, Java, JavaScript, dynamic webpages. I would
see this as an separate page, such as "Topic Guides", "Topics", or
"Guides".
Planning
Good framework for training development. It's really a cyclical process
where trainer perspectives can provide valuable feedback for determining
needs and managing expectations
Learning Objectives: What does the audience need?
This should be part of any registration form/process. I can try to
incorporate this into our online registration process (retroactively get
feedback from people who have attended one of our first four sessions).
I know we need to address the NOSCRIPT part of our registration form,
but I'd welcome feedback on any outstanding accessibility issues:
http://w3.gsa.gov/web/m/cita.nsf/CourseRegistration2?OpenForm
Learning Objectives: What are the audience's learning objectives?
This should be part of any registration and evaluation or feedback
form/process. I can try to incorporate this into our online
registration process (retroactively get feedback from people who have
attended one of our first four sessions). Registration forms are much
easier to deal with online than evaluation forms, unless participants
each have access to a computer with web access.
Resources and Approaches
Great to have resources and approaches linked to specific learning
objectives. Encouraging trainers to submit perspective documents
could lead to additional learning objectives, and help identify more
resources for each objective. Subsequent trainers would have more
"raw" material readily available to use in their course, although our
experience so far raises substantial issues with the need for printed
and alternate format materials (we distributed about 300 copies of a
28-page, double-sided handout). What is the best method for providing
alternate formats for a slide show presentation?
Arranging Resources for Trainings
Online or offline? Working offline requires extensive copying of all
files (all graphics as well as HTML), although only copying the HTML
file provides a clear indication of whether or not people are using ALT
text since all images are "broken links". Online is particular
effective if you include a live demonstration of real webpages by one or
more people with disabilities. Having one or more representatives of
the disability community presenting also provides better discussions,
since they can relate actual experiences.
Karl Hebenstreit, Jr.
US General Services Administration
Office of Governmentwide Policy
Center for Information Technology Accommodation
http://www.itpolicy.gsa.gov/cita
Federal IT Accessibility Initiative
http://www.section508.gov
Received on Thursday, 8 June 2000 17:01:08 UTC